Form: Cost-of-Breach DisclosureSource: IBM Cost of a Data BreachFiled: 28 Apr 2026
DataBreachCost.comOpen calc
Independent breach-cost research, read by security and risk leaders.Sponsor this site →
Filing FL-20131029-rotech-healthcareHHS OCR Breach Register, Florida

Breach filing

Archived

Rotech Healthcare Inc.: 10,680 individuals, Oct 2013.

Rotech Healthcare Inc. reported a breach of unsecured protected health information to the HHS Office for Civil Rights on 29 October 2013. The filing records the organisation as a healthcare provider in Florida and lists 10,680 individuals affected, which makes it the 171st largest of the 463 Florida filings on the register and the 38th largest of the 277 filings submitted nationally in 2013. Among the 25 Florida filings made in 2013 it ranks 3rd.

Individuals affected

10,680

As reported to HHS

Modelled cost (IBM 2025)

$1.71M

Method shown, not disclosed

Rank in FL

171st

of 463 Florida filings

Rank in 2013

38th

of 277 filings nationally

Section F.1 / The filing

As posted by HHS OCR

Every value below is the portal's own field for this filing, plus its rank within the register.

Covered entity type
Healthcare Provider
Individuals affected
10,680
Breach submission date
29 October 2013
Submission year
2013
Type of breach
Unauthorized Access/Disclosure
Location of breached information
Laptop
Business associate present
No
Portal status
listed in the HHS OCR breach portal archive
Rank in Florida by size
171st of 463
Rank in 2013 nationally
38th of 277
Florida median filing
4,912 individuals
Register id (derived)
FL-20131029-rotech-healthcare

Section F.2 / In context

Where this filing sits in Florida and in 2013

OCR classifies the incident as unauthorized access or disclosure, with the breached information held in a laptop. Unauthorized Access/Disclosure is the type recorded on 119 of the 463 Florida filings (26%) and on 27% of all filings submitted in 2013. Laptop appears on 6% of Florida filings.

No business associate is recorded on the filing; 25% of Florida filings do involve one. At 10,680 individuals the breach is 2.2 times the Florida median filing of 4,912 and 2.7 times the national median of 4,000 across all 7,884 filings. It sits in the 10,000 to 99,999 band, which holds 1,938 filings.

As of 28 August 2026 the case is listed in the HHS OCR breach portal archive. OCR's closing summary of the case is reproduced in full below.

Florida's breach notification statute (Fla. Stat. 501.171) requires notice to affected residents within 30 days of determining a breach occurred (up to 15-day extension for good cause). Its attorney general threshold: 500 or more Florida residents. The HIPAA Breach Notification Rule ran alongside it: notice to affected individuals and to HHS without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after discovery, which is the clock that put this filing on the portal.

Multiplying 10,680 individuals by IBM's $160 customer-PII cost per record (Cost of a Data Breach 2025, the figure the site's calculator uses) gives a modelled $1.71M; the 2026 edition's $192 gives $2.05M. Both are modelled estimates with the method shown, not costs disclosed by Rotech Healthcare Inc.. For scale, IBM's 2026 average cost of a healthcare breach is $6.64M, so this filing models at 0.3 times the sector average.

Section F.3 / OCR closing summary

The portal's archived description, in full

Written by the Office for Civil Rights when the case was closed and reproduced verbatim from the HHS export.

A former employee of the covered entity (CE), Rotech, removed and retained electronic files from a company computer, some of which contained the protected health information (PHI) of employees in relation to the CE's group health plan. The demographic, clinical and financial information of 10,680 individuals was affected by the breach. The CE provided breach notification to HHS, affected individuals, and the media. In response to the breach, the CE updated its policies and procedures regarding downloading of information from company-issued computers to external devices, retrieval of company-issued removable media from departing employees, and destruction of PHI and ePHI. The CE improved safeguards by disabling USB ports on most computers and encrypting all company laptops. Additionally, the CE conducted a HIPAA gap analysis, implemented a process for periodic analysis, and updated and secured the methods used to back up data. Finally, the CE obtained outside experts to assist in reviewing and enhancing HIPAA training and retrained employees. OCR obtained assurances that the corrective actions listed above were completed.

Section F.5 / Modelled cost

10,680 individuals through IBM's per-record figures

Modelled cost / method shown, not a disclosed cost

Modelled

IBM 2025 customer PII, $160 per record

$1.71M

10,680 x $160

IBM 2026 customer PII, $192 per record

$2.05M

10,680 x $192

Method: individuals affected, as reported by Rotech Healthcare Inc. to HHS, multiplied by IBM's customer-PII cost per record (Cost of a Data Breach 2025 Figure 6 and the 2026 edition). No cost has been disclosed by the entity for this filing; the figure is a planning estimate, not a fact about the breach. IBM's per-record figures come from mid-volume breaches and IBM cautions against applying them to breaches involving millions of records; the site's per-record page explains where the multiplication holds and where it breaks down.

Context: IBM's average cost of a healthcare breach is $6.64M in the 2026 report ($7.42M in 2025); the global average across all sectors was $4.44M in 2025.

Cost per record: method and limits / Healthcare breach cost, IBM 2026

Section F.6 / Notification clock

Florida statute and the HIPAA rule

State notification statute

Florida: Fla. Stat. 501.171

Florida Information Protection Act (FIPA)

Notice to individuals
Within 30 days of determining a breach occurred (up to 15-day extension for good cause)
Attorney general threshold
500 or more Florida residents (Within 30 days of the breach determination)
Private right of action
No: FIPA does not permit direct individual lawsuits; AG enforcement only
Penalty
Escalating civil penalties up to $500,000 per breach; also an unfair or deceptive trade practice

The HIPAA Breach Notification Rule runs alongside the state statute: notice to affected individuals and to HHS without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after discovery.

Section F.7 / Peer filings

Florida filings closest in size

Neighbours by size rank among Florida filings in 2013, topped up from other years where 2013 has too few. Filings of 10,000 or more link to their own page.

Covered entityTypeIndividualsSubmitted
University of FloridaHealthcare Provider14,5193 Apr 2013
United HomeCare Services, Inc.Healthcare Provider12,2999 Mar 2013
Holy Cross Hospital, Inc.Healthcare Provider9,90024 Sep 2013
Gulf Breeze Family Eyecare, IncHealthcare Provider9,62617 Jun 2013

Index / Companion schedules

Provenance

Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, Breach Portal (breaches affecting 500 or more individuals), retrieved 2026-08-28. Public domain. Individuals affected and dates as reported by the covered entity.

Portal: ocrportal.hhs.gov breach report. Statutory basis: HITECH Act section 13402(e)(4): the Secretary must post a list of breaches of unsecured protected health information affecting 500 or more individuals. Breaches affecting fewer than 500 individuals are reported to OCR annually and are not posted, so they are not on this register. Status wording follows the portal's two tabs ("Cases Currently Under Investigation" and "Archive") as of 28 August 2026; a filing moves to the archive when OCR closes the case. Modelled costs on this site are a method applied to the reported count, using IBM Cost of a Data Breach per-record figures, and are never a cost disclosed by the entity. This row: hhs-breach-archive__2026-08-28.csv, export row 6325.

Corrections: if you represent a listed entity and the portal row has been amended, email [email protected] with the portal entry and we will re-pull the export.