Form: Cost-of-Breach DisclosureSource: IBM Cost of a Data BreachFiled: 28 Apr 2026
DataBreachCost.comOpen calc
Independent breach-cost research, read by security and risk leaders.Sponsor this site →
Filing NC-20171208-unc-health-care-systemHHS OCR Breach Register, North Carolina

Breach filing

Archived

UNC Health Care System: 27,113 individuals, Dec 2017.

UNC Health Care System reported a breach of unsecured protected health information to the HHS Office for Civil Rights on 8 December 2017. The filing records the organisation as a healthcare provider in North Carolina and lists 27,113 individuals affected, which makes it the 46th largest of the 207 North Carolina filings on the register and the 31st largest of the 358 filings submitted nationally in 2017. Among the 9 North Carolina filings made in 2017 it ranks 3rd.

Individuals affected

27,113

As reported to HHS

Modelled cost (IBM 2025)

$4.34M

Method shown, not disclosed

Rank in NC

46th

of 207 North Carolina filings

Rank in 2017

31st

of 358 filings nationally

Section F.1 / The filing

As posted by HHS OCR

Every value below is the portal's own field for this filing, plus its rank within the register.

Covered entity type
Healthcare Provider
Individuals affected
27,113
Breach submission date
8 December 2017
Submission year
2017
Type of breach
Theft
Location of breached information
Desktop Computer
Business associate present
No
Portal status
listed in the HHS OCR breach portal archive
Rank in North Carolina by size
46th of 207
Rank in 2017 nationally
31st of 358
North Carolina median filing
3,679 individuals
Register id (derived)
NC-20171208-unc-health-care-system

Section F.2 / In context

Where this filing sits in North Carolina and in 2017

OCR classifies the incident as theft, with the breached information held in a desktop computer. Theft is the type recorded on 18 of the 207 North Carolina filings (9%) and on 15% of all filings submitted in 2017. Desktop Computer appears on 7% of North Carolina filings.

No business associate is recorded on the filing; 26% of North Carolina filings do involve one. At 27,113 individuals the breach is 7.4 times the North Carolina median filing of 3,679 and 6.8 times the national median of 4,000 across all 7,884 filings. It sits in the 10,000 to 99,999 band, which holds 1,938 filings.

As of 28 August 2026 the case is listed in the HHS OCR breach portal archive. OCR's closing summary of the case is reproduced in full below.

North Carolina's breach notification statute (N.C. Gen. Stat. 75-65) requires notice to affected residents without unreasonable delay. Its attorney general threshold: all breaches (Consumer Protection Division of the AG). The HIPAA Breach Notification Rule ran alongside it: notice to affected individuals and to HHS without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after discovery, which is the clock that put this filing on the portal.

Multiplying 27,113 individuals by IBM's $160 customer-PII cost per record (Cost of a Data Breach 2025, the figure the site's calculator uses) gives a modelled $4.34M; the 2026 edition's $192 gives $5.21M. Both are modelled estimates with the method shown, not costs disclosed by UNC Health Care System. For scale, IBM's 2026 average cost of a healthcare breach is $6.64M, so this filing models at 0.8 times the sector average.

Section F.3 / OCR closing summary

The portal's archived description, in full

Written by the Office for Civil Rights when the case was closed and reproduced verbatim from the HHS export.

UNC Health Care System, the covered entity (CE), reported that a computer was stolen that contained 27,113 patients' files of a newly acquired medical practice (Burlington Dermatology). The types of protected health information (PHI) involved in the breach included names, addresses, birthdates, phone numbers, employment information, and social security information. 3,132 of the 27,113 individuals are deceased and the CE had no contact information for the next of kin or personal representatives. The CE provided breach notification to the remaining 23,981 affected individuals, HHS, and the media, and posted substitute notice on the CE's website. As a result of this incident, and OCR's investigation, the CE implemented new policies and procedures to limit the intake of patient files and computer systems from newly acquired medical practices and to upgrade acquired files and computer systems to comply with the CE's security policies. OCR obtained assurances that the CE implemented the corrective actions noted above

Section F.5 / Modelled cost

27,113 individuals through IBM's per-record figures

Modelled cost / method shown, not a disclosed cost

Modelled

IBM 2025 customer PII, $160 per record

$4.34M

27,113 x $160

IBM 2026 customer PII, $192 per record

$5.21M

27,113 x $192

Method: individuals affected, as reported by UNC Health Care System to HHS, multiplied by IBM's customer-PII cost per record (Cost of a Data Breach 2025 Figure 6 and the 2026 edition). No cost has been disclosed by the entity for this filing; the figure is a planning estimate, not a fact about the breach. IBM's per-record figures come from mid-volume breaches and IBM cautions against applying them to breaches involving millions of records; the site's per-record page explains where the multiplication holds and where it breaks down.

Context: IBM's average cost of a healthcare breach is $6.64M in the 2026 report ($7.42M in 2025); the global average across all sectors was $4.44M in 2025.

Cost per record: method and limits / Healthcare breach cost, IBM 2026

Section F.6 / Notification clock

North Carolina statute and the HIPAA rule

State notification statute

North Carolina: N.C. Gen. Stat. 75-65

Identity Theft Protection Act

Notice to individuals
Without unreasonable delay
Attorney general threshold
All breaches (Consumer Protection Division of the AG) (Concurrent with consumer notification)
Private right of action
Yes: Civil action under N.C. Gen. Stat. 75-16 as an unfair and deceptive trade practice; treble damages
Penalty
Treble damages for affected individuals; AG may seek injunctive relief, penalties, and restitution

The HIPAA Breach Notification Rule runs alongside the state statute: notice to affected individuals and to HHS without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after discovery.

Section F.7 / Peer filings

North Carolina filings closest in size

Neighbours by size rank among North Carolina filings in 2017, topped up from other years where 2017 has too few. Filings of 10,000 or more link to their own page.

Covered entityTypeIndividualsSubmitted
Morehead Memorial HospitalHealthcare Provider66,00015 Sep 2017
ABB, Inc.Healthcare Provider28,01211 Sep 2017
North Carolina Department of Health and Human ServicesHealth Plan12,73123 Feb 2017
The Dermatology Center of Raleigh PAHealthcare Provider3,0005 Jul 2017

Index / Companion schedules

Provenance

Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, Breach Portal (breaches affecting 500 or more individuals), retrieved 2026-08-28. Public domain. Individuals affected and dates as reported by the covered entity.

Portal: ocrportal.hhs.gov breach report. Statutory basis: HITECH Act section 13402(e)(4): the Secretary must post a list of breaches of unsecured protected health information affecting 500 or more individuals. Breaches affecting fewer than 500 individuals are reported to OCR annually and are not posted, so they are not on this register. Status wording follows the portal's two tabs ("Cases Currently Under Investigation" and "Archive") as of 28 August 2026; a filing moves to the archive when OCR closes the case. Modelled costs on this site are a method applied to the reported count, using IBM Cost of a Data Breach per-record figures, and are never a cost disclosed by the entity. This row: hhs-breach-archive__2026-08-28.csv, export row 5022.

Corrections: if you represent a listed entity and the portal row has been amended, email [email protected] with the portal entry and we will re-pull the export.