Form: Cost-of-Breach DisclosureSource: IBM Cost of a Data BreachFiled: 28 Apr 2026
DataBreachCost.comOpen calc
Independent breach-cost research, read by security and risk leaders.Sponsor this site →
Filing FL-20160219-public-health-trust-of-miami-dade-countyHHS OCR Breach Register, Florida

Breach filing

Archived

Public Health Trust of Miami-Dade County, Florida: 24,188 individuals, Feb 2016.

Public Health Trust of Miami-Dade County, Florida reported a breach of unsecured protected health information to the HHS Office for Civil Rights on 19 February 2016. The filing records the organisation as a healthcare provider in Florida and lists 24,188 individuals affected, which makes it the 128th largest of the 463 Florida filings on the register and the 43rd largest of the 328 filings submitted nationally in 2016. Among the 27 Florida filings made in 2016 it ranks 4th.

Individuals affected

24,188

As reported to HHS

Modelled cost (IBM 2025)

$3.87M

Method shown, not disclosed

Rank in FL

128th

of 463 Florida filings

Rank in 2016

43rd

of 328 filings nationally

Section F.1 / The filing

As posted by HHS OCR

Every value below is the portal's own field for this filing, plus its rank within the register.

Covered entity type
Healthcare Provider
Individuals affected
24,188
Breach submission date
19 February 2016
Submission year
2016
Type of breach
Unauthorized Access/Disclosure
Location of breached information
Electronic Medical Record
Business associate present
No
Portal status
listed in the HHS OCR breach portal archive
Rank in Florida by size
128th of 463
Rank in 2016 nationally
43rd of 328
Florida median filing
4,912 individuals
Register id (derived)
FL-20160219-public-health-trust-of-miami-dade-county

Section F.2 / In context

Where this filing sits in Florida and in 2016

OCR classifies the incident as unauthorized access or disclosure, with the breached information held in an electronic medical record system. Unauthorized Access/Disclosure is the type recorded on 119 of the 463 Florida filings (26%) and on 40% of all filings submitted in 2016. Electronic Medical Record appears on 9% of Florida filings.

No business associate is recorded on the filing; 25% of Florida filings do involve one. At 24,188 individuals the breach is 4.9 times the Florida median filing of 4,912 and 6.0 times the national median of 4,000 across all 7,884 filings. It sits in the 10,000 to 99,999 band, which holds 1,938 filings.

As of 28 August 2026 the case is listed in the HHS OCR breach portal archive. OCR's closing summary of the case is reproduced in full below.

Florida's breach notification statute (Fla. Stat. 501.171) requires notice to affected residents within 30 days of determining a breach occurred (up to 15-day extension for good cause). Its attorney general threshold: 500 or more Florida residents. The HIPAA Breach Notification Rule ran alongside it: notice to affected individuals and to HHS without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after discovery, which is the clock that put this filing on the portal.

Multiplying 24,188 individuals by IBM's $160 customer-PII cost per record (Cost of a Data Breach 2025, the figure the site's calculator uses) gives a modelled $3.87M; the 2026 edition's $192 gives $4.64M. Both are modelled estimates with the method shown, not costs disclosed by Public Health Trust of Miami-Dade County, Florida. For scale, IBM's 2026 average cost of a healthcare breach is $6.64M, so this filing models at 0.7 times the sector average.

Section F.3 / OCR closing summary

The portal's archived description, in full

Written by the Office for Civil Rights when the case was closed and reproduced verbatim from the HHS export.

The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has imposed a civil money penalty of $2,154,000 against Jackson Health System (JHS) for violations of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Security and Breach Notification Rules between 2013 and 2016. JHS is a nonprofit academic medical system based in Miami, Florida, which operates six major hospitals, a network of urgent care centers, multiple primary care and specialty care centers, long-term care nursing facilities, and corrections health services clinics. JHS provides health services to approximately 650,000 patients annually, and employs about 12,000 individuals.

On August 22, 2013, JHS submitted a breach report to OCR stating that its Health Information Management Department had lost paper records containing the protected health information (PHI) of 756 patients in January 2013. JHS's internal investigation determined that an additional three boxes of patient records were also lost in December 2012; however, JHS did not report the additional loss or the increased number of individuals affected to 1,436, until June 7, 2016.

In July 2015, OCR initiated an investigation following a media report that disclosed the PHI of a JHS patient. A reporter had shared a photograph of a JHS operating room screen containing the patient's medical information on social media. JHS subsequently determined that two employees had accessed this patient's electronic medical record without a job-related purpose.

On February 19, 2016, JHS submitted a breach report to OCR reporting that an employee had been selling patient PHI. The employee had inappropriately accessed over 24,000 patients' records since 2011.

OCR's investigation revealed that JHS failed to provide timely and accurate breach notification to the Secretary of HHS, conduct enterprise-wide risk analyses, manage identified risks to a reasonable and appropriate level, regularly review information system activity records, and restrict authorization of its workforce members' access to patient ePHI to the minimum necessary to accomplish their job duties.

JHS waived its right to a hearing and did not contest the findings in OCR's Notice of Proposed Determination. Accordingly, OCR issued a Notice of Final Determination and JHS has paid the full civil money penalty.

"OCR's investigation revealed a HIPAA compliance program that had been in disarray for a number of years," said OCR Director Roger Severino. "This hospital system's compliance program failed to detect and stop an employee who stole and sold thousands of patient records; lost patient files without notifying OCR as required by law; and failed to properly secure PHI that was leaked to the media."

The Notice of Proposed Determination and Notice of Final Determination may be found at: http://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/compliance-enforcement/agreements/jackson/index.html.

Section F.5 / Modelled cost

24,188 individuals through IBM's per-record figures

Modelled cost / method shown, not a disclosed cost

Modelled

IBM 2025 customer PII, $160 per record

$3.87M

24,188 x $160

IBM 2026 customer PII, $192 per record

$4.64M

24,188 x $192

Method: individuals affected, as reported by Public Health Trust of Miami-Dade County, Florida to HHS, multiplied by IBM's customer-PII cost per record (Cost of a Data Breach 2025 Figure 6 and the 2026 edition). No cost has been disclosed by the entity for this filing; the figure is a planning estimate, not a fact about the breach. IBM's per-record figures come from mid-volume breaches and IBM cautions against applying them to breaches involving millions of records; the site's per-record page explains where the multiplication holds and where it breaks down.

Context: IBM's average cost of a healthcare breach is $6.64M in the 2026 report ($7.42M in 2025); the global average across all sectors was $4.44M in 2025.

Cost per record: method and limits / Healthcare breach cost, IBM 2026

Section F.6 / Notification clock

Florida statute and the HIPAA rule

State notification statute

Florida: Fla. Stat. 501.171

Florida Information Protection Act (FIPA)

Notice to individuals
Within 30 days of determining a breach occurred (up to 15-day extension for good cause)
Attorney general threshold
500 or more Florida residents (Within 30 days of the breach determination)
Private right of action
No: FIPA does not permit direct individual lawsuits; AG enforcement only
Penalty
Escalating civil penalties up to $500,000 per breach; also an unfair or deceptive trade practice

The HIPAA Breach Notification Rule runs alongside the state statute: notice to affected individuals and to HHS without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after discovery.

Section F.7 / Peer filings

Florida filings closest in size

Neighbours by size rank among Florida filings in 2016, topped up from other years where 2016 has too few. Filings of 10,000 or more link to their own page.

Covered entityTypeIndividualsSubmitted
Radiology Regional Center, PAHealthcare Provider483,06312 Feb 2016
Southeast Eye Institute, P.A. dba eye Associates of PinellasHealthcare Provider87,3145 May 2016
HeartCare ConsultantsHealthcare Provider16,00011 May 2016
Vision Care Florida, LLCHealthcare Provider7,50016 Nov 2016

Index / Companion schedules

Provenance

Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, Breach Portal (breaches affecting 500 or more individuals), retrieved 2026-08-28. Public domain. Individuals affected and dates as reported by the covered entity.

Portal: ocrportal.hhs.gov breach report. Statutory basis: HITECH Act section 13402(e)(4): the Secretary must post a list of breaches of unsecured protected health information affecting 500 or more individuals. Breaches affecting fewer than 500 individuals are reported to OCR annually and are not posted, so they are not on this register. Status wording follows the portal's two tabs ("Cases Currently Under Investigation" and "Archive") as of 28 August 2026; a filing moves to the archive when OCR closes the case. Modelled costs on this site are a method applied to the reported count, using IBM Cost of a Data Breach per-record figures, and are never a cost disclosed by the entity. This row: hhs-breach-archive__2026-08-28.csv, export row 5658.

Corrections: if you represent a listed entity and the portal row has been amended, email [email protected] with the portal entry and we will re-pull the export.