Breach filing
ArchivedCancer Care Group, P.C.: 55,000 individuals, Aug 2012.
Cancer Care Group, P.C. reported a breach of unsecured protected health information to the HHS Office for Civil Rights on 28 August 2012. The filing records the organisation as a healthcare provider in Indiana and lists 55,000 individuals affected, which makes it the 30th largest of the 200 Indiana filings on the register and the 10th largest of the 218 filings submitted nationally in 2012. Among the 10 Indiana filings made in 2012 it ranks 1st.
Individuals affected
55,000
As reported to HHS
Modelled cost (IBM 2025)
$8.80M
Method shown, not disclosed
Rank in IN
30th
of 200 Indiana filings
Rank in 2012
10th
of 218 filings nationally
Section F.1 / The filing
As posted by HHS OCR
Every value below is the portal's own field for this filing, plus its rank within the register.
- Covered entity type
- Healthcare Provider
- Individuals affected
- 55,000
- Breach submission date
- 28 August 2012
- Submission year
- 2012
- Type of breach
- Theft
- Location of breached information
- Other Portable Electronic Device
- Business associate present
- No
- State
- Indiana (IN)
- Portal status
- listed in the HHS OCR breach portal archive
- Rank in Indiana by size
- 30th of 200
- Rank in 2012 nationally
- 10th of 218
- Indiana median filing
- 3,600 individuals
- Register id (derived)
- IN-20120828-cancer-care-group-pc
Section F.2 / In context
Where this filing sits in Indiana and in 2012
OCR classifies the incident as theft, with the breached information held in another portable electronic device. Theft is the type recorded on 30 of the 200 Indiana filings (15%) and on 61% of all filings submitted in 2012. Other Portable Electronic Device appears on 2% of Indiana filings.
No business associate is recorded on the filing; 31% of Indiana filings do involve one. At 55,000 individuals the breach is 15 times the Indiana median filing of 3,600 and 14 times the national median of 4,000 across all 7,884 filings. It sits in the 10,000 to 99,999 band, which holds 1,938 filings.
As of 28 August 2026 the case is listed in the HHS OCR breach portal archive. OCR's closing summary of the case is reproduced in full below.
Indiana's breach notification statute (Ind. Code 24-4.9) requires notice to affected residents without unreasonable delay, no more than 45 days after discovery. Its attorney general threshold: all qualifying breaches. The HIPAA Breach Notification Rule ran alongside it: notice to affected individuals and to HHS without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after discovery, which is the clock that put this filing on the portal.
Multiplying 55,000 individuals by IBM's $160 customer-PII cost per record (Cost of a Data Breach 2025, the figure the site's calculator uses) gives a modelled $8.80M; the 2026 edition's $192 gives $10.6M. Both are modelled estimates with the method shown, not costs disclosed by Cancer Care Group, P.C.. For scale, IBM's 2026 average cost of a healthcare breach is $6.64M, so this filing models at 1.6 times the sector average.
Section F.3 / OCR closing summary
The portal's archived description, in full
Written by the Office for Civil Rights when the case was closed and reproduced verbatim from the HHS export.
$750,000 HIPAA settlement emphasizes the importance of risk analysis and device and media control policies
Cancer Care Group, P.C. agreed to settle potential violations of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Privacy and Security Rules with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office for Civil Rights (OCR). Cancer Care paid $750,000 and will adopt a robust corrective action plan to correct deficiencies in its HIPAA compliance program. Cancer Care Group is a radiation oncology private physician practice, with 13 radiation oncologists serving hospitals and clinics throughout Indiana.
On August 29, 2012, OCR received notification from Cancer Care regarding a breach of unsecured electronic protected health information (ePHI) after a laptop bag was stolen from an employee's car. The bag contained the employee's computer and unencrypted backup media, which contained the names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, insurance information and clinical information of approximately 55,000 current and former Cancer Care patients.
OCR's subsequent investigation found that, prior to the breach, Cancer Care was in widespread non-compliance with the HIPAA Security Rule. It had not conducted an enterprise-wide risk analysis when the breach occurred in July 2012. Further, Cancer Care did not have in place a written policy specific to the removal of hardware and electronic media containing ePHI into and out of its facilities, even though this was common practice within the organization. OCR found that these two issues, in particular, contributed to the breach, as an enterprise-wide risk analysis could have identified the removal of unencrypted backup media as an area of significant risk to Cancer Care's ePHI, and a comprehensive device and media control policy could have provided employees with direction in regard to their responsibilities when removing devices containing ePHI from the facility.
"Organizations must complete a comprehensive risk analysis and establish strong policies and procedures to protect patients' health information," said OCR Director Jocelyn Samuels. "Further, proper encryption of mobile devices and electronic media reduces the likelihood of a breach of protected health information."
Cancer Care has taken corrective action with regard to the specific requirements of the Privacy and Security Rules that are at the core of this enforcement action, as well as actions to come into compliance with the other provisions of the HIPAA Rules. The Resolution Agreement and Corrective Action Plan (CAP) can be found on the OCR website at: http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/enforcement/examples/cancercare.html
HHS offers guidance on how your organization can conduct a HIPAA Risk Analysis: http://www.healthit.gov/providers-professionals/security-risk-assessment
To learn more about non-discrimination and health information privacy laws, your civil rights, and privacy rights in health care and human service settings, and to find information on filing a complaint, visit us at http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/office.
###
Section F.5 / Modelled cost
55,000 individuals through IBM's per-record figures
Modelled cost / method shown, not a disclosed cost
ModelledIBM 2025 customer PII, $160 per record
$8.80M
55,000 x $160
IBM 2026 customer PII, $192 per record
$10.6M
55,000 x $192
Method: individuals affected, as reported by Cancer Care Group, P.C. to HHS, multiplied by IBM's customer-PII cost per record (Cost of a Data Breach 2025 Figure 6 and the 2026 edition). No cost has been disclosed by the entity for this filing; the figure is a planning estimate, not a fact about the breach. IBM's per-record figures come from mid-volume breaches and IBM cautions against applying them to breaches involving millions of records; the site's per-record page explains where the multiplication holds and where it breaks down.
Context: IBM's average cost of a healthcare breach is $6.64M in the 2026 report ($7.42M in 2025); the global average across all sectors was $4.44M in 2025.
Cost per record: method and limits / Healthcare breach cost, IBM 2026
Section F.6 / Notification clock
Indiana statute and the HIPAA rule
State notification statute
Indiana: Ind. Code 24-4.9
- Notice to individuals
- Without unreasonable delay, no more than 45 days after discovery
- Attorney general threshold
- All qualifying breaches (Within the 45-day consumer notification window)
- Private right of action
- No: Enforced exclusively by the Indiana Attorney General
- Penalty
- Up to $150,000 per deceptive act, plus investigation costs
The HIPAA Breach Notification Rule runs alongside the state statute: notice to affected individuals and to HHS without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after discovery.
Section F.7 / Peer filings
Indiana filings closest in size
Neighbours by size rank among Indiana filings in 2012, topped up from other years where 2012 has too few. Filings of 10,000 or more link to their own page.
| Covered entity | Type | Individuals | Submitted | Breach type | Location | BA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Select Health Network | Business Associate | 56,790 | 13 Nov 2019 | |||
| Enterprise Services LLC | Business Associate | 56,075 | 27 Jun 2017 | |||
| LCP Transportation, Inc | Business Associate | 54,528 | 15 Mar 2019 | |||
| Gibson General Hospital | Healthcare Provider | 28,893 | 26 Dec 2012 | |||
| Indiana Internal Medicine Consultants | Healthcare Provider | 20,000 | 9 Mar 2012 |
Index / Companion schedules
13 HHS breach register
→Hub: every filing, by state, year and entity.
04 Biggest breaches
→Mega-breaches with primary-source cost figures.
Industry / Healthcare
→IBM 2026: $6.64M average, 13 years at #1.
Regulation / HIPAA penalties
→OCR enforcement tiers and the 60-day rule.
11 50-state laws
→Deadline, AG threshold and penalties per state.
Cost / Per record
→Where the per-record model is reliable.
Provenance
Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, Breach Portal (breaches affecting 500 or more individuals), retrieved 2026-08-28. Public domain. Individuals affected and dates as reported by the covered entity.
Portal: ocrportal.hhs.gov breach report. Statutory basis: HITECH Act section 13402(e)(4): the Secretary must post a list of breaches of unsecured protected health information affecting 500 or more individuals. Breaches affecting fewer than 500 individuals are reported to OCR annually and are not posted, so they are not on this register. Status wording follows the portal's two tabs ("Cases Currently Under Investigation" and "Archive") as of 28 August 2026; a filing moves to the archive when OCR closes the case. Modelled costs on this site are a method applied to the reported count, using IBM Cost of a Data Breach per-record figures, and are never a cost disclosed by the entity. This row: hhs-breach-archive__2026-08-28.csv, export row 6620.
Corrections: if you represent a listed entity and the portal row has been amended, email [email protected] with the portal entry and we will re-pull the export.