Form: Cost-of-Breach DisclosureSource: IBM Cost of a Data BreachFiled: 28 Apr 2026
DataBreachCost.comOpen calc
Independent breach-cost research, read by security and risk leaders.Sponsor this site →
Filing MN-20110927-fairview-health-servicesHHS OCR Breach Register, Minnesota

Breach filing

Archived

Fairview Health Services: 14,623 individuals, Sep 2011.

Fairview Health Services reported a breach of unsecured protected health information to the HHS Office for Civil Rights on 27 September 2011. The filing records the organisation as a healthcare provider in Minnesota and lists 14,623 individuals affected, which makes it the 49th largest of the 189 Minnesota filings on the register and the 31st largest of the 200 filings submitted nationally in 2011. Among the 4 Minnesota filings made in 2011 it ranks 1st.

Individuals affected

14,623

As reported to HHS

Modelled cost (IBM 2025)

$2.34M

Method shown, not disclosed

Rank in MN

49th

of 189 Minnesota filings

Rank in 2011

31st

of 200 filings nationally

Section F.1 / The filing

As posted by HHS OCR

Every value below is the portal's own field for this filing, plus its rank within the register.

Covered entity type
Healthcare Provider
Individuals affected
14,623
Breach submission date
27 September 2011
Submission year
2011
Type of breach
Theft
Location of breached information
Laptop
Business associate present
No
Portal status
listed in the HHS OCR breach portal archive
Rank in Minnesota by size
49th of 189
Rank in 2011 nationally
31st of 200
Minnesota median filing
3,159 individuals
Register id (derived)
MN-20110927-fairview-health-services

Section F.2 / In context

Where this filing sits in Minnesota and in 2011

OCR classifies the incident as theft, with the breached information held in a laptop. Theft is the type recorded on 13 of the 189 Minnesota filings (7%) and on 62% of all filings submitted in 2011. Laptop appears on 7% of Minnesota filings.

No business associate is recorded on the filing; 35% of Minnesota filings do involve one. At 14,623 individuals the breach is 4.6 times the Minnesota median filing of 3,159 and 3.7 times the national median of 4,000 across all 7,884 filings. It sits in the 10,000 to 99,999 band, which holds 1,938 filings.

As of 28 August 2026 the case is listed in the HHS OCR breach portal archive. OCR's closing summary of the case is reproduced in full below.

Minnesota's breach notification statute (Minn. Stat. 325E.61) requires notice to affected residents in the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay. Its attorney general threshold: no general AG requirement (reporting agencies at 500+ residents within 48 hours). The HIPAA Breach Notification Rule ran alongside it: notice to affected individuals and to HHS without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after discovery, which is the clock that put this filing on the portal.

Multiplying 14,623 individuals by IBM's $160 customer-PII cost per record (Cost of a Data Breach 2025, the figure the site's calculator uses) gives a modelled $2.34M; the 2026 edition's $192 gives $2.81M. Both are modelled estimates with the method shown, not costs disclosed by Fairview Health Services. For scale, IBM's 2026 average cost of a healthcare breach is $6.64M, so this filing models at 0.4 times the sector average.

Section F.3 / OCR closing summary

The portal's archived description, in full

Written by the Office for Civil Rights when the case was closed and reproduced verbatim from the HHS export.

An unencrypted laptop computer storing the electronic protected health information (ePHI) of approximately 14,623 individuals was stolen from the locked vehicle of a workforce member of Accretive Health, a business associate (BA) of the covered entity (CE), Fairview Health Services. The ePHI included individuals' names, addresses, dates of birth, social security numbers, financial information, and clinical information. The CE provided breach notification to HHS, affected individuals, and the media. It also provided complimentary credit monitoring services to affected individuals. Following the breach, the CE investigated the root cause of the breach, developed a new policy which addresses the risks associated with sharing sensitive data with third parties, and obtained assurances from the BA that it would undertake appropriate corrective actions. OCR obtained a copy of the BA agreement between the CE and the BA at the time of the breach. OCR also obtained evidence and assurances that the CE implemented the corrective actions listed.

Section F.5 / Modelled cost

14,623 individuals through IBM's per-record figures

Modelled cost / method shown, not a disclosed cost

Modelled

IBM 2025 customer PII, $160 per record

$2.34M

14,623 x $160

IBM 2026 customer PII, $192 per record

$2.81M

14,623 x $192

Method: individuals affected, as reported by Fairview Health Services to HHS, multiplied by IBM's customer-PII cost per record (Cost of a Data Breach 2025 Figure 6 and the 2026 edition). No cost has been disclosed by the entity for this filing; the figure is a planning estimate, not a fact about the breach. IBM's per-record figures come from mid-volume breaches and IBM cautions against applying them to breaches involving millions of records; the site's per-record page explains where the multiplication holds and where it breaks down.

Context: IBM's average cost of a healthcare breach is $6.64M in the 2026 report ($7.42M in 2025); the global average across all sectors was $4.44M in 2025.

Cost per record: method and limits / Healthcare breach cost, IBM 2026

Section F.6 / Notification clock

Minnesota statute and the HIPAA rule

State notification statute

Minnesota: Minn. Stat. 325E.61

Notice to individuals
In the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay
Attorney general threshold
No general AG requirement (reporting agencies at 500+ residents within 48 hours)
Private right of action
No: Only the Minnesota Attorney General may enforce
Penalty
Up to $25,000 per violation; contractual waivers of notification are void

The HIPAA Breach Notification Rule runs alongside the state statute: notice to affected individuals and to HHS without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after discovery.

Section F.7 / Peer filings

Minnesota filings closest in size

Neighbours by size rank among Minnesota filings in 2011, topped up from other years where 2011 has too few. Filings of 10,000 or more link to their own page.

Covered entityTypeIndividualsSubmitted
Family Service RochesterHealthcare Provider17,03717 Feb 2017
UnitedHealth Group health plan single affiliated covered entityHealth Plan16,2914 Jun 2010
Nemadji Research Corporation d/b/a California Reimbursement EnterprisesBusiness Associate14,5918 Jul 2019
North Memorial Health CareHealthcare Provider9,49727 Sep 2011
InStep Foot Clinic, P.A.Healthcare Provider2,60011 Oct 2011

Index / Companion schedules

Provenance

Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, Breach Portal (breaches affecting 500 or more individuals), retrieved 2026-08-28. Public domain. Individuals affected and dates as reported by the covered entity.

Portal: ocrportal.hhs.gov breach report. Statutory basis: HITECH Act section 13402(e)(4): the Secretary must post a list of breaches of unsecured protected health information affecting 500 or more individuals. Breaches affecting fewer than 500 individuals are reported to OCR annually and are not posted, so they are not on this register. Status wording follows the portal's two tabs ("Cases Currently Under Investigation" and "Archive") as of 28 August 2026; a filing moves to the archive when OCR closes the case. Modelled costs on this site are a method applied to the reported count, using IBM Cost of a Data Breach per-record figures, and are never a cost disclosed by the entity. This row: hhs-breach-archive__2026-08-28.csv, export row 6816.

Corrections: if you represent a listed entity and the portal row has been amended, email [email protected] with the portal entry and we will re-pull the export.