Form: Cost-of-Breach DisclosureSource: IBM Cost of a Data BreachFiled: 28 Apr 2026
DataBreachCost.comOpen calc
Independent breach-cost research, read by security and risk leaders.Sponsor this site →
Filing MT-20160115-new-west-health-services-d-b-a-new-westHHS OCR Breach Register, Montana

Breach filing

Archived

New West Health Services d/b/a New West Medicare: 28,209 individuals, Jan 2016.

New West Health Services d/b/a New West Medicare reported a breach of unsecured protected health information to the HHS Office for Civil Rights on 15 January 2016. The filing records the organisation as a health plan in Montana and lists 28,209 individuals affected, which makes it the 8th largest of the 36 Montana filings on the register and the 37th largest of the 328 filings submitted nationally in 2016. Among the 2 Montana filings made in 2016 it ranks 1st.

Individuals affected

28,209

As reported to HHS

Modelled cost (IBM 2025)

$4.51M

Method shown, not disclosed

Rank in MT

8th

of 36 Montana filings

Rank in 2016

37th

of 328 filings nationally

Section F.1 / The filing

As posted by HHS OCR

Every value below is the portal's own field for this filing, plus its rank within the register.

Covered entity type
Health Plan
Individuals affected
28,209
Breach submission date
15 January 2016
Submission year
2016
Type of breach
Loss
Location of breached information
Laptop
Business associate present
No
Portal status
listed in the HHS OCR breach portal archive
Rank in Montana by size
8th of 36
Rank in 2016 nationally
37th of 328
Montana median filing
6,000 individuals
Register id (derived)
MT-20160115-new-west-health-services-d-b-a-new-west

Section F.2 / In context

Where this filing sits in Montana and in 2016

OCR classifies the incident as loss of records or equipment, with the breached information held in a laptop. Loss is the type recorded on 2 of the 36 Montana filings (6%) and on 5% of all filings submitted in 2016. Laptop appears on 11% of Montana filings.

No business associate is recorded on the filing; 14% of Montana filings do involve one. At 28,209 individuals the breach is 4.7 times the Montana median filing of 6,000 and 7.1 times the national median of 4,000 across all 7,884 filings. It sits in the 10,000 to 99,999 band, which holds 1,938 filings.

As of 28 August 2026 the case is listed in the HHS OCR breach portal archive. OCR's closing summary of the case is reproduced in full below.

Montana's breach notification statute (Mont. Code Ann. 30-14-1704 et seq.) requires notice to affected residents without unreasonable delay. Its attorney general threshold: all breaches affecting Montana residents. The HIPAA Breach Notification Rule ran alongside it: notice to affected individuals and to HHS without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after discovery, which is the clock that put this filing on the portal.

Multiplying 28,209 individuals by IBM's $160 customer-PII cost per record (Cost of a Data Breach 2025, the figure the site's calculator uses) gives a modelled $4.51M; the 2026 edition's $192 gives $5.42M. Both are modelled estimates with the method shown, not costs disclosed by New West Health Services d/b/a New West Medicare. For scale, IBM's 2026 average cost of a healthcare breach is $6.64M, so this filing models at 0.8 times the sector average.

Section F.3 / OCR closing summary

The portal's archived description, in full

Written by the Office for Civil Rights when the case was closed and reproduced verbatim from the HHS export.

OCR opened an investigation of the covered entity (CE), New West Health Services, dba New West Medicare, after it reported that an employee's unencrypted laptop computer was stolen from a hotel meeting room. The types of electronic protected health information (ePHI) involved in the breach included demographic information, social security numbers, Medicare claim numbers, financial information, diagnoses, medical histories, and prescription information, and affected 28,209 individuals. The CE provided breach notification to HHS, affected individuals, and the media and provided individuals' with free credit monitoring and identity theft protection services. Following the breach, the CE improved safeguards by recalling all of its laptops to ensure they were encrypted, installing geo-location capabilities on all of its laptops, and installing remote wiping software on all of its company-issued BlackBerry devices. The CE also sanctioned the employee whose laptop was stolen, retrained its staff on HIPAA privacy and security requirements, and created a new data incident response plan. OCR obtained assurances that the CE implemented the corrective actions noted above. Due to financial considerations, the CE announced that it will cease all operations in 2017 after it fulfills its 2016 insurance plan requirements.

Section F.5 / Modelled cost

28,209 individuals through IBM's per-record figures

Modelled cost / method shown, not a disclosed cost

Modelled

IBM 2025 customer PII, $160 per record

$4.51M

28,209 x $160

IBM 2026 customer PII, $192 per record

$5.42M

28,209 x $192

Method: individuals affected, as reported by New West Health Services d/b/a New West Medicare to HHS, multiplied by IBM's customer-PII cost per record (Cost of a Data Breach 2025 Figure 6 and the 2026 edition). No cost has been disclosed by the entity for this filing; the figure is a planning estimate, not a fact about the breach. IBM's per-record figures come from mid-volume breaches and IBM cautions against applying them to breaches involving millions of records; the site's per-record page explains where the multiplication holds and where it breaks down.

Context: IBM's average cost of a healthcare breach is $6.64M in the 2026 report ($7.42M in 2025); the global average across all sectors was $4.44M in 2025.

Cost per record: method and limits / Healthcare breach cost, IBM 2026

Section F.6 / Notification clock

Montana statute and the HIPAA rule

State notification statute

Montana: Mont. Code Ann. 30-14-1704 et seq.

Notice to individuals
Without unreasonable delay
Attorney general threshold
All breaches affecting Montana residents (When notice is provided to affected individuals)
Private right of action
No: Only the Montana Attorney General may bring enforcement actions
Penalty
Unfair or deceptive trade practice; up to $10,000 per violation, plus restitution

The HIPAA Breach Notification Rule runs alongside the state statute: notice to affected individuals and to HHS without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after discovery.

Section F.7 / Peer filings

Montana filings closest in size

Neighbours by size rank among Montana filings in 2016, topped up from other years where 2016 has too few. Filings of 10,000 or more link to their own page.

Covered entityTypeIndividualsSubmitted
Planned Parenthood of MontanaHealthcare Provider56,9175 Nov 2024
Ortho Montana, PSCHealthcare Provider37,0008 Feb 2011
Community Hospital of AnacondaOpenHealthcare Provider21,24319 May 2025
Western Health ScreeningBusiness Associate15,32614 Apr 2017
Bozeman Health Deaconess HospitalHealthcare Provider1,12421 Mar 2016

Index / Companion schedules

Provenance

Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, Breach Portal (breaches affecting 500 or more individuals), retrieved 2026-08-28. Public domain. Individuals affected and dates as reported by the covered entity.

Portal: ocrportal.hhs.gov breach report. Statutory basis: HITECH Act section 13402(e)(4): the Secretary must post a list of breaches of unsecured protected health information affecting 500 or more individuals. Breaches affecting fewer than 500 individuals are reported to OCR annually and are not posted, so they are not on this register. Status wording follows the portal's two tabs ("Cases Currently Under Investigation" and "Archive") as of 28 August 2026; a filing moves to the archive when OCR closes the case. Modelled costs on this site are a method applied to the reported count, using IBM Cost of a Data Breach per-record figures, and are never a cost disclosed by the entity. This row: hhs-breach-archive__2026-08-28.csv, export row 5673.

Corrections: if you represent a listed entity and the portal row has been amended, email [email protected] with the portal entry and we will re-pull the export.