Form: Cost-of-Breach DisclosureSource: IBM Cost of a Data BreachFiled: 28 Apr 2026
DataBreachCost.comOpen calc
Independent breach-cost research, read by security and risk leaders.Sponsor this site →
Filing OR-20140519-central-city-concernHHS OCR Breach Register, Oregon

Breach filing

Archived

Central City Concern: 17,914 individuals, May 2014.

Central City Concern reported a breach of unsecured protected health information to the HHS Office for Civil Rights on 19 May 2014. The filing records the organisation as a healthcare provider in Oregon and lists 17,914 individuals affected, which makes it the 21st largest of the 120 Oregon filings on the register and the 50th largest of the 314 filings submitted nationally in 2014. Among the 4 Oregon filings made in 2014 it ranks 2nd.

Individuals affected

17,914

As reported to HHS

Modelled cost (IBM 2025)

$2.87M

Method shown, not disclosed

Rank in OR

21st

of 120 Oregon filings

Rank in 2014

50th

of 314 filings nationally

Section F.1 / The filing

As posted by HHS OCR

Every value below is the portal's own field for this filing, plus its rank within the register.

Covered entity type
Healthcare Provider
Individuals affected
17,914
Breach submission date
19 May 2014
Submission year
2014
Type of breach
Unauthorized Access/Disclosure
Location of breached information
Other
Business associate present
No
Portal status
listed in the HHS OCR breach portal archive
Rank in Oregon by size
21st of 120
Rank in 2014 nationally
50th of 314
Oregon median filing
2,400 individuals
Register id (derived)
OR-20140519-central-city-concern

Section F.2 / In context

Where this filing sits in Oregon and in 2014

OCR classifies the incident as unauthorized access or disclosure, with the breached information held in another location. Unauthorized Access/Disclosure is the type recorded on 37 of the 120 Oregon filings (31%) and on 34% of all filings submitted in 2014. Other appears on 8% of Oregon filings.

No business associate is recorded on the filing; 23% of Oregon filings do involve one. At 17,914 individuals the breach is 7.5 times the Oregon median filing of 2,400 and 4.5 times the national median of 4,000 across all 7,884 filings. It sits in the 10,000 to 99,999 band, which holds 1,938 filings.

As of 28 August 2026 the case is listed in the HHS OCR breach portal archive. OCR's closing summary of the case is reproduced in full below.

Oregon's breach notification statute (ORS 646A.600 et seq.) requires notice to affected residents as soon as practicable but no later than 45 days after discovery. Its attorney general threshold: 250 or more Oregon residents. The HIPAA Breach Notification Rule ran alongside it: notice to affected individuals and to HHS without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after discovery, which is the clock that put this filing on the portal.

Multiplying 17,914 individuals by IBM's $160 customer-PII cost per record (Cost of a Data Breach 2025, the figure the site's calculator uses) gives a modelled $2.87M; the 2026 edition's $192 gives $3.44M. Both are modelled estimates with the method shown, not costs disclosed by Central City Concern. For scale, IBM's 2026 average cost of a healthcare breach is $6.64M, so this filing models at 0.5 times the sector average.

Section F.3 / OCR closing summary

The portal's archived description, in full

Written by the Office for Civil Rights when the case was closed and reproduced verbatim from the HHS export.

Law enforcement investigated a former employee of the covered entity (CE), Central City Concern, for identity theft and notified the CE that the former employee admitted to misusing approximately 15 Employment Access Center (EAC) clients' information. The personal information involved in the breach included names, social security numbers, addresses, dates of birth and other identifiers, but no data from the CE's health care component. The CE provided breach notification to HHS, the media, and all 17,914 clients whose information was accessible by the former employee, as well as posting substitute notice on its website. It also provided a year of free credit monitoring for affected individuals. As a result of the incident, the CE improved safeguards for the EAC database. The CE also contracted with a third party to complete a security risk assessment of all its locations and updated its privacy and security policies and procedures. OCR's investigation confirmed that the appropriate notifications were made and that corrective actions steps were taken.

Section F.5 / Modelled cost

17,914 individuals through IBM's per-record figures

Modelled cost / method shown, not a disclosed cost

Modelled

IBM 2025 customer PII, $160 per record

$2.87M

17,914 x $160

IBM 2026 customer PII, $192 per record

$3.44M

17,914 x $192

Method: individuals affected, as reported by Central City Concern to HHS, multiplied by IBM's customer-PII cost per record (Cost of a Data Breach 2025 Figure 6 and the 2026 edition). No cost has been disclosed by the entity for this filing; the figure is a planning estimate, not a fact about the breach. IBM's per-record figures come from mid-volume breaches and IBM cautions against applying them to breaches involving millions of records; the site's per-record page explains where the multiplication holds and where it breaks down.

Context: IBM's average cost of a healthcare breach is $6.64M in the 2026 report ($7.42M in 2025); the global average across all sectors was $4.44M in 2025.

Cost per record: method and limits / Healthcare breach cost, IBM 2026

Section F.6 / Notification clock

Oregon statute and the HIPAA rule

State notification statute

Oregon: ORS 646A.600 et seq.

Oregon Consumer Information Protection Act

Notice to individuals
As soon as practicable but no later than 45 days after discovery
Attorney general threshold
250 or more Oregon residents (Within the 45-day notification window)
Private right of action
No: No express PROA; remedies may run through the Unlawful Trade Practices Act
Penalty
Up to $1,000 per violation; continuing violations up to $500,000

The HIPAA Breach Notification Rule runs alongside the state statute: notice to affected individuals and to HHS without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after discovery.

Section F.7 / Peer filings

Oregon filings closest in size

Neighbours by size rank among Oregon filings in 2014, topped up from other years where 2014 has too few. Filings of 10,000 or more link to their own page.

Covered entityTypeIndividualsSubmitted
The Corvallis Clinic, P.C.Healthcare Provider41,00019 Dec 2014
Portland VA Medical CenterHealthcare Provider1,74029 Oct 2014
Albertina Kerr CentersHealthcare Provider1,3206 Oct 2014

Index / Companion schedules

Provenance

Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, Breach Portal (breaches affecting 500 or more individuals), retrieved 2026-08-28. Public domain. Individuals affected and dates as reported by the covered entity.

Portal: ocrportal.hhs.gov breach report. Statutory basis: HITECH Act section 13402(e)(4): the Secretary must post a list of breaches of unsecured protected health information affecting 500 or more individuals. Breaches affecting fewer than 500 individuals are reported to OCR annually and are not posted, so they are not on this register. Status wording follows the portal's two tabs ("Cases Currently Under Investigation" and "Archive") as of 28 August 2026; a filing moves to the archive when OCR closes the case. Modelled costs on this site are a method applied to the reported count, using IBM Cost of a Data Breach per-record figures, and are never a cost disclosed by the entity. This row: hhs-breach-archive__2026-08-28.csv, export row 6126.

Corrections: if you represent a listed entity and the portal row has been amended, email [email protected] with the portal entry and we will re-pull the export.