Form: Cost-of-Breach DisclosureSource: IBM Cost of a Data BreachFiled: 28 Apr 2026
DataBreachCost.comOpen calc
Independent breach-cost research, read by security and risk leaders.Sponsor this site →
Filing WA-20131127-uw-medicine-privacy-manager-breachHHS OCR Breach Register, Washington

Breach filing

Archived

UW Medicine, Privacy Manager - Breach: 76,183 individuals, Nov 2013.

UW Medicine, Privacy Manager - Breach reported a breach of unsecured protected health information to the HHS Office for Civil Rights on 27 November 2013. The filing records the organisation as a healthcare provider in Washington and lists 76,183 individuals affected, which makes it the 26th largest of the 185 Washington filings on the register and the 7th largest of the 277 filings submitted nationally in 2013. Among the 6 Washington filings made in 2013 it ranks 1st.

Individuals affected

76,183

As reported to HHS

Modelled cost (IBM 2025)

$12.2M

Method shown, not disclosed

Rank in WA

26th

of 185 Washington filings

Rank in 2013

7th

of 277 filings nationally

Section F.1 / The filing

As posted by HHS OCR

Every value below is the portal's own field for this filing, plus its rank within the register.

Covered entity type
Healthcare Provider
Individuals affected
76,183
Breach submission date
27 November 2013
Submission year
2013
Type of breach
Hacking/IT Incident
Location of breached information
Desktop Computer
Business associate present
No
Portal status
listed in the HHS OCR breach portal archive
Rank in Washington by size
26th of 185
Rank in 2013 nationally
7th of 277
Washington median filing
3,950 individuals
Register id (derived)
WA-20131127-uw-medicine-privacy-manager-breach

Section F.2 / In context

Where this filing sits in Washington and in 2013

OCR classifies the incident as a hacking or IT incident, with the breached information held in a desktop computer. Hacking/IT Incident is the type recorded on 117 of the 185 Washington filings (63%) and on 10% of all filings submitted in 2013. Desktop Computer appears on 8% of Washington filings.

No business associate is recorded on the filing; 21% of Washington filings do involve one. At 76,183 individuals the breach is 19 times the Washington median filing of 3,950 and 19 times the national median of 4,000 across all 7,884 filings. It sits in the 10,000 to 99,999 band, which holds 1,938 filings.

As of 28 August 2026 the case is listed in the HHS OCR breach portal archive. OCR's closing summary of the case is reproduced in full below.

Washington's breach notification statute (RCW 19.255.010) requires notice to affected residents no later than 30 days after discovery. Its attorney general threshold: more than 500 Washington residents. The HIPAA Breach Notification Rule ran alongside it: notice to affected individuals and to HHS without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after discovery, which is the clock that put this filing on the portal.

Multiplying 76,183 individuals by IBM's $160 customer-PII cost per record (Cost of a Data Breach 2025, the figure the site's calculator uses) gives a modelled $12.2M; the 2026 edition's $192 gives $14.6M. Both are modelled estimates with the method shown, not costs disclosed by UW Medicine, Privacy Manager - Breach. For scale, IBM's 2026 average cost of a healthcare breach is $6.64M, so this filing models at 2.2 times the sector average.

Section F.3 / OCR closing summary

The portal's archived description, in full

Written by the Office for Civil Rights when the case was closed and reproduced verbatim from the HHS export.

The University of Washington Medicine (UWM) has agreed to settle charges that it potentially violated the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Security Rule by failing to implement policies and procedures to prevent, detect, contain, and correct security violations. UWM is an affiliated covered entity, which includes designated health care components and other entities under the control of the University of Washington, including University of Washington Medical Center, the primary teaching hospital of the University of Washington School of Medicine. Affiliated covered entities must have in place appropriate policies and processes to assure HIPAA compliance with respect to each of the entities that are part of the affiliated group. The settlement includes a monetary payment of $750,000, a corrective action plan, and annual reports on the organization's compliance efforts.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights (OCR) initiated its investigation of the UWM following receipt of a breach report on November 27, 2013, which indicated that the electronic protected health information (e-PHI) of approximately 90,000 individuals was accessed after an employee downloaded an email attachment that contained malicious malware. The malware compromised the organization's IT system, affecting the data of two different groups of patients: 1) approximately 76,000 patients involving a combination of patient names, medical record numbers, dates of service, and/or charges or bill balances; and 2) approximately 15,000 patients involving names, medical record numbers, other demographics such as address and phone number, dates of birth, charges or bill balances, social security numbers, insurance identification or Medicare numbers.

OCR's investigation indicated UWM's security policies required its affiliated entities to have up-to-date, documented system-level risk assessments and to implement safeguards in compliance with the Security Rule. However, UWM did not ensure that all of its affiliated entities were properly conducting risk assessments and appropriately responding to the potential risks and vulnerabilities in their respective environments.

"All too often we see covered entities with a limited risk analysis that focuses on a specific system such as the electronic medical record or that fails to provide appropriate oversight and accountability for all parts of the enterprise," said OCR Director Jocelyn Samuels. "An effective risk analysis is one that is comprehensive in scope and is conducted across the organization to sufficiently address the risks and vulnerabilities to patient data."

The Resolution Agreement and Corrective Action Plan can be found on the OCR website at: http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/enforcement/examples/uwm/index.html

HHS offers guidance on how your organization can conduct a HIPAA Risk Analysis: http://www.healthit.gov/providers-professionals/security-risk-assessment

Section F.5 / Modelled cost

76,183 individuals through IBM's per-record figures

Modelled cost / method shown, not a disclosed cost

Modelled

IBM 2025 customer PII, $160 per record

$12.2M

76,183 x $160

IBM 2026 customer PII, $192 per record

$14.6M

76,183 x $192

Method: individuals affected, as reported by UW Medicine, Privacy Manager - Breach to HHS, multiplied by IBM's customer-PII cost per record (Cost of a Data Breach 2025 Figure 6 and the 2026 edition). No cost has been disclosed by the entity for this filing; the figure is a planning estimate, not a fact about the breach. IBM's per-record figures come from mid-volume breaches and IBM cautions against applying them to breaches involving millions of records; the site's per-record page explains where the multiplication holds and where it breaks down.

Context: IBM's average cost of a healthcare breach is $6.64M in the 2026 report ($7.42M in 2025); the global average across all sectors was $4.44M in 2025.

Cost per record: method and limits / Healthcare breach cost, IBM 2026

Section F.6 / Notification clock

Washington statute and the HIPAA rule

State notification statute

Washington: RCW 19.255.010

Notice to individuals
No later than 30 days after discovery
Attorney general threshold
More than 500 Washington residents (Within the same 30-day window)
Private right of action
Yes: Civil lawsuits under the Consumer Protection Act; actual damages plus up to $1,000 punitive for willful violations
Penalty
Consumers may recover damages, costs, and attorney fees; AG may seek penalties and injunctive relief

The HIPAA Breach Notification Rule runs alongside the state statute: notice to affected individuals and to HHS without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after discovery.

Section F.7 / Peer filings

Washington filings closest in size

Neighbours by size rank among Washington filings in 2013, topped up from other years where 2013 has too few. Filings of 10,000 or more link to their own page.

Covered entityTypeIndividualsSubmitted
Grays Harbor Community HospitalHealthcare Provider88,39912 Aug 2019
Sight Partners Physicians, P.C.Healthcare Provider86,10114 Jun 2022
Kitsap Mental Health ServicesOpenHealthcare Provider70,75716 Dec 2024
Walla Walla VA Medical CenterHealthcare Provider1,51918 Dec 2013
Group Health CooperativeHealthcare Provider1,0153 Oct 2013

Index / Companion schedules

Provenance

Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, Breach Portal (breaches affecting 500 or more individuals), retrieved 2026-08-28. Public domain. Individuals affected and dates as reported by the covered entity.

Portal: ocrportal.hhs.gov breach report. Statutory basis: HITECH Act section 13402(e)(4): the Secretary must post a list of breaches of unsecured protected health information affecting 500 or more individuals. Breaches affecting fewer than 500 individuals are reported to OCR annually and are not posted, so they are not on this register. Status wording follows the portal's two tabs ("Cases Currently Under Investigation" and "Archive") as of 28 August 2026; a filing moves to the archive when OCR closes the case. Modelled costs on this site are a method applied to the reported count, using IBM Cost of a Data Breach per-record figures, and are never a cost disclosed by the entity. This row: hhs-breach-archive__2026-08-28.csv, export row 6295.

Corrections: if you represent a listed entity and the portal row has been amended, email [email protected] with the portal entry and we will re-pull the export.