Form: Cost-of-Breach DisclosureSource: IBM Cost of a Data BreachFiled: 28 Apr 2026
DataBreachCost.comOpen calc
Independent breach-cost research, read by security and risk leaders.Sponsor this site →
Filing AL-20190419-kim-p-kornegay-dmdHHS OCR Breach Register, Alabama

Breach filing

Archived

KIM P. KORNEGAY, DMD: 27,000 individuals, Apr 2019.

KIM P. KORNEGAY, DMD reported a breach of unsecured protected health information to the HHS Office for Civil Rights on 19 April 2019. The filing records the organisation as a healthcare provider in Alabama and lists 27,000 individuals affected, which makes it the 25th largest of the 98 Alabama filings on the register and the 90th largest of the 511 filings submitted nationally in 2019. Among the 4 Alabama filings made in 2019 it ranks 2nd.

Individuals affected

27,000

As reported to HHS

Modelled cost (IBM 2025)

$4.32M

Method shown, not disclosed

Rank in AL

25th

of 98 Alabama filings

Rank in 2019

90th

of 511 filings nationally

Section F.1 / The filing

As posted by HHS OCR

Every value below is the portal's own field for this filing, plus its rank within the register.

Covered entity type
Healthcare Provider
Individuals affected
27,000
Breach submission date
19 April 2019
Submission year
2019
Type of breach
Theft
Location of breached information
Desktop Computer, Electronic Medical Record, Paper/Films
Business associate present
No
Portal status
listed in the HHS OCR breach portal archive
Rank in Alabama by size
25th of 98
Rank in 2019 nationally
90th of 511
Alabama median filing
5,000 individuals
Register id (derived)
AL-20190419-kim-p-kornegay-dmd

Section F.2 / In context

Where this filing sits in Alabama and in 2019

OCR classifies the incident as theft, with the breached information held in a desktop computer, an electronic medical record system and paper records or films. Theft is the type recorded on 16 of the 98 Alabama filings (16%) and on 7% of all filings submitted in 2019. Desktop Computer appears on 6% of Alabama filings.

No business associate is recorded on the filing; 29% of Alabama filings do involve one. At 27,000 individuals the breach is 5.4 times the Alabama median filing of 5,000 and 6.8 times the national median of 4,000 across all 7,884 filings. It sits in the 10,000 to 99,999 band, which holds 1,938 filings.

As of 28 August 2026 the case is listed in the HHS OCR breach portal archive. OCR's closing summary of the case is reproduced in full below.

Alabama's breach notification statute (Ala. Code 8-38-1 et seq.) requires notice to affected residents without unreasonable delay, no later than 45 days after determining a breach occurred. Its attorney general threshold: more than 1,000 Alabama residents. The HIPAA Breach Notification Rule ran alongside it: notice to affected individuals and to HHS without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after discovery, which is the clock that put this filing on the portal.

Multiplying 27,000 individuals by IBM's $160 customer-PII cost per record (Cost of a Data Breach 2025, the figure the site's calculator uses) gives a modelled $4.32M; the 2026 edition's $192 gives $5.18M. Both are modelled estimates with the method shown, not costs disclosed by KIM P. KORNEGAY, DMD. For scale, IBM's 2026 average cost of a healthcare breach is $6.64M, so this filing models at 0.8 times the sector average.

Section F.3 / OCR closing summary

The portal's archived description, in full

Written by the Office for Civil Rights when the case was closed and reproduced verbatim from the HHS export.

Kim P. Kornegay, DMD, the covered entity (CE), reported that two unauthorized individuals entered his office and removed and accessed protected health information (PHI). This breach affected 24,000 individuals, The PHI involved included names, addresses, Social Security numbers, drivers' license information, insurance information, financial information, and clinical information. In response to this breach, the CE filed a police report and a motion in superior court for the return of the PHI. In response to OCR's investigation, the CE implemented additional administrative and physical safeguards to better protect PHI. OCR provided the CE with technical assistance on the proper reporting of breach notifications. OCR obtained assurances that the CE implemented the corrective actions noted above.

Section F.5 / Modelled cost

27,000 individuals through IBM's per-record figures

Modelled cost / method shown, not a disclosed cost

Modelled

IBM 2025 customer PII, $160 per record

$4.32M

27,000 x $160

IBM 2026 customer PII, $192 per record

$5.18M

27,000 x $192

Method: individuals affected, as reported by KIM P. KORNEGAY, DMD to HHS, multiplied by IBM's customer-PII cost per record (Cost of a Data Breach 2025 Figure 6 and the 2026 edition). No cost has been disclosed by the entity for this filing; the figure is a planning estimate, not a fact about the breach. IBM's per-record figures come from mid-volume breaches and IBM cautions against applying them to breaches involving millions of records; the site's per-record page explains where the multiplication holds and where it breaks down.

Context: IBM's average cost of a healthcare breach is $6.64M in the 2026 report ($7.42M in 2025); the global average across all sectors was $4.44M in 2025.

Cost per record: method and limits / Healthcare breach cost, IBM 2026

Section F.6 / Notification clock

Alabama statute and the HIPAA rule

State notification statute

Alabama: Ala. Code 8-38-1 et seq.

Alabama Data Breach Notification Act of 2018

Notice to individuals
Without unreasonable delay, no later than 45 days after determining a breach occurred
Attorney general threshold
More than 1,000 Alabama residents (Within the same 45-day window)
Private right of action
No: Enforcement is exclusive to the Alabama Attorney General
Penalty
Civil penalties up to $5,000 per day, capped at $500,000 per breach, as an unlawful trade practice

The HIPAA Breach Notification Rule runs alongside the state statute: notice to affected individuals and to HHS without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after discovery.

Section F.7 / Peer filings

Alabama filings closest in size

Neighbours by size rank among Alabama filings in 2019, topped up from other years where 2019 has too few. Filings of 10,000 or more link to their own page.

Covered entityTypeIndividualsSubmitted
Sarrell DentalHealthcare Provider363,61712 Sep 2019
University of Alabama at BirminghamHealthcare Provider19,5573 Oct 2019
Brewer Porch Children's Center / The University of AlabamaHealthcare Provider72716 Jul 2019

Index / Companion schedules

Provenance

Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, Breach Portal (breaches affecting 500 or more individuals), retrieved 2026-08-28. Public domain. Individuals affected and dates as reported by the covered entity.

Portal: ocrportal.hhs.gov breach report. Statutory basis: HITECH Act section 13402(e)(4): the Secretary must post a list of breaches of unsecured protected health information affecting 500 or more individuals. Breaches affecting fewer than 500 individuals are reported to OCR annually and are not posted, so they are not on this register. Status wording follows the portal's two tabs ("Cases Currently Under Investigation" and "Archive") as of 28 August 2026; a filing moves to the archive when OCR closes the case. Modelled costs on this site are a method applied to the reported count, using IBM Cost of a Data Breach per-record figures, and are never a cost disclosed by the entity. This row: hhs-breach-archive__2026-08-28.csv, export row 4488.

Corrections: if you represent a listed entity and the portal row has been amended, email [email protected] with the portal entry and we will re-pull the export.