Form: Cost-of-Breach DisclosureSource: IBM Cost of a Data BreachFiled: 28 Apr 2026
DataBreachCost.comOpen calc
Independent breach-cost research, read by security and risk leaders.Sponsor this site →
Filing UT-20140807-central-utah-clinicHHS OCR Breach Register, Utah

Breach filing

Archived

Central Utah Clinic: 31,677 individuals, Aug 2014.

Central Utah Clinic reported a breach of unsecured protected health information to the HHS Office for Civil Rights on 7 August 2014. The filing records the organisation as a healthcare provider in Utah and lists 31,677 individuals affected, which makes it the 13th largest of the 68 Utah filings on the register and the 39th largest of the 314 filings submitted nationally in 2014. Among the 5 Utah filings made in 2014 it ranks 1st.

Individuals affected

31,677

As reported to HHS

Modelled cost (IBM 2025)

$5.07M

Method shown, not disclosed

Rank in UT

13th

of 68 Utah filings

Rank in 2014

39th

of 314 filings nationally

Section F.1 / The filing

As posted by HHS OCR

Every value below is the portal's own field for this filing, plus its rank within the register.

Covered entity type
Healthcare Provider
Individuals affected
31,677
Breach submission date
7 August 2014
Submission year
2014
Type of breach
Hacking/IT Incident
Location of breached information
Network Server
Business associate present
No
Portal status
listed in the HHS OCR breach portal archive
Rank in Utah by size
13th of 68
Rank in 2014 nationally
39th of 314
Utah median filing
5,381 individuals
Register id (derived)
UT-20140807-central-utah-clinic

Section F.2 / In context

Where this filing sits in Utah and in 2014

OCR classifies the incident as a hacking or IT incident, with the breached information held in a network server. Hacking/IT Incident is the type recorded on 51 of the 68 Utah filings (75%) and on 12% of all filings submitted in 2014. Network Server is the most common location in the state, appearing on 57% of Utah filings.

No business associate is recorded on the filing; 34% of Utah filings do involve one. At 31,677 individuals the breach is 5.9 times the Utah median filing of 5,381 and 7.9 times the national median of 4,000 across all 7,884 filings. It sits in the 10,000 to 99,999 band, which holds 1,938 filings.

As of 28 August 2026 the case is listed in the HHS OCR breach portal archive. OCR's closing summary of the case is reproduced in full below.

Utah's breach notification statute (Utah Code 13-44-202) requires notice to affected residents in the most expedient time possible, without unreasonable delay. Its attorney general threshold: 500 or more Utah residents (AG and Utah Cyber Center). The HIPAA Breach Notification Rule ran alongside it: notice to affected individuals and to HHS without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after discovery, which is the clock that put this filing on the portal.

Multiplying 31,677 individuals by IBM's $160 customer-PII cost per record (Cost of a Data Breach 2025, the figure the site's calculator uses) gives a modelled $5.07M; the 2026 edition's $192 gives $6.08M. Both are modelled estimates with the method shown, not costs disclosed by Central Utah Clinic. For scale, IBM's 2026 average cost of a healthcare breach is $6.64M, so this filing models at 0.9 times the sector average.

Section F.3 / OCR closing summary

The portal's archived description, in full

Written by the Office for Civil Rights when the case was closed and reproduced verbatim from the HHS export.

On June 9, 2014, Revere Health, the covered entity (CE), discovered that cybercriminals had compromised one of its Internet-facing servers containing electronic protected health information (ePHI), affecting 31,677 patients. The compromised ePHI which included images, written imaging notes, and radiology reports dating 2010 and earlier, which contained identifying patient information - names, and/or dates of birth, and/or social security numbers, and/or addresses, and/or telephone numbers. The CE provided breach notification to the affected individuals, the media, and HHS. Following the breach, the CE took several corrective actions, including but not limited to: updating its inventory of ePHI, servers, databases, users, and applications; reducing vulnerabilities and blocking the affected server from the Internet; conducting penetration tests; drafting new security policies; implementing new response procedures; updating patch management procedures; upgrading the functionality in its firewalls, antivirus, and antimalware software; expanding its security team; and providing security and awareness training to its workforce. In the course of its review, OCR provided the CE with technical assistance regarding necessary changes to its policies and procedures, and its security management process.

Section F.5 / Modelled cost

31,677 individuals through IBM's per-record figures

Modelled cost / method shown, not a disclosed cost

Modelled

IBM 2025 customer PII, $160 per record

$5.07M

31,677 x $160

IBM 2026 customer PII, $192 per record

$6.08M

31,677 x $192

Method: individuals affected, as reported by Central Utah Clinic to HHS, multiplied by IBM's customer-PII cost per record (Cost of a Data Breach 2025 Figure 6 and the 2026 edition). No cost has been disclosed by the entity for this filing; the figure is a planning estimate, not a fact about the breach. IBM's per-record figures come from mid-volume breaches and IBM cautions against applying them to breaches involving millions of records; the site's per-record page explains where the multiplication holds and where it breaks down.

Context: IBM's average cost of a healthcare breach is $6.64M in the 2026 report ($7.42M in 2025); the global average across all sectors was $4.44M in 2025.

Cost per record: method and limits / Healthcare breach cost, IBM 2026

Section F.6 / Notification clock

Utah statute and the HIPAA rule

State notification statute

Utah: Utah Code 13-44-202

Protection of Personal Information Act

Notice to individuals
In the most expedient time possible, without unreasonable delay
Attorney general threshold
500 or more Utah residents (AG and Utah Cyber Center) (Without unreasonable delay)
Private right of action
No: No PROA; only the Attorney General can enforce
Penalty
Up to $2,500 per consumer, capped at $100,000 aggregate for related violations

The HIPAA Breach Notification Rule runs alongside the state statute: notice to affected individuals and to HHS without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after discovery.

Section F.7 / Peer filings

Utah filings closest in size

Neighbours by size rank among Utah filings in 2014, topped up from other years where 2014 has too few. Filings of 10,000 or more link to their own page.

Covered entityTypeIndividualsSubmitted
Alliance Health Networks, LLCHealthcare Provider42,37215 Feb 2016
MedQuest Pharmacy, Inc.Healthcare Provider39,44723 Dec 2021
Intermountain HealthcareHealthcare Provider28,62816 Jul 2021
Sorenson Communications/CaptionCall Group Health PlanHealth Plan9,80024 Apr 2014
Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc.Healthcare Provider64329 Mar 2014

Index / Companion schedules

Provenance

Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, Breach Portal (breaches affecting 500 or more individuals), retrieved 2026-08-28. Public domain. Individuals affected and dates as reported by the covered entity.

Portal: ocrportal.hhs.gov breach report. Statutory basis: HITECH Act section 13402(e)(4): the Secretary must post a list of breaches of unsecured protected health information affecting 500 or more individuals. Breaches affecting fewer than 500 individuals are reported to OCR annually and are not posted, so they are not on this register. Status wording follows the portal's two tabs ("Cases Currently Under Investigation" and "Archive") as of 28 August 2026; a filing moves to the archive when OCR closes the case. Modelled costs on this site are a method applied to the reported count, using IBM Cost of a Data Breach per-record figures, and are never a cost disclosed by the entity. This row: hhs-breach-archive__2026-08-28.csv, export row 6068.

Corrections: if you represent a listed entity and the portal row has been amended, email [email protected] with the portal entry and we will re-pull the export.